tldr; DAOs are described as having “loose” associations, transparent operations, open membership, global reach, and grassroots rather than hierarchical organization. DAOs are limited to use cases like investment, social utility, and non-profit work where either fewer members or less coordination are needed. Instead of naively implementing an org chart, perhaps we can add a different form of structure. The concept of “pods” or “metaDAOs” seems a natural fit.
This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.
